Re: Plan needed for switching m68k to 32-bit alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, Thorsten Glaser wrote:


But, as has been pointed out, if we make the current alignment explicit 
everywhere, the kernel ABI does not have to change¹. And new syscalls, 
ioctls, structs, etc. can just be made with natural alignment in mind (I 
bet most are already anyway) and with padding assumptions made expli‐ 
cit (which again probably is done already anyway).


Yes, upstream developers can be expected accept patches that make explicit 
the alignment of struct members. That's what I've been saying for years. 

Luckily, that doesn't require a new ABI. It does require volunteers who 
are willing to write and submit patches for those packages that matter to 
users.

And that is the real problem: the manpower shortage. The only solution I 
proposed for that problem was better collaboration and better allocation 
of resources. But his straight-forward request for assistance was an 
excellent idea of Adrian's:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2024/11/msg00007.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux