Re: Plan needed for switching m68k to 32-bit alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 19:49 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
Here is the current top of the list of packages that won't build on m68k 
because of the 2-byte alignment issue:

   2814 cargo:m68k
    900 ghc:m68k
    261 gccgo-14:m68k
    241 libqt5core5a:m68k
    181 architecture-is-64-bit:m68k
    117 libglib2.0-0:m68k
     81 libcompiler-libs-ocaml-dev-0a396:m68k
     81 golang-go:m68k
     71 wx3.2-headers:m68k
     57 qt6-base-dev:m68k
     57 python3:m68k
     46 libamd2:m68k

Are you going to fix these for me?


Are you the only user?

I am the one who does all the work on Debian/m68k.

Seriously though, thanks for providing data. Now, if you would link to the 
upstream refusals for CPython and golang, I'll do what I can to help.

I honestly don't have to justify myself towards you. I will use the Christmas
holidays to make a decision. I will either drop the m68k port from Debian or
just perform a forced switch.

I don't care anymore what you're posting here. You're just wasting my time.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913





[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux