Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: Add tracirqs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert, all,

On 23/10/2024 11:31, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
Hi Geert,

On 23/10/2024 11:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Jean-Michel,

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:07 AM Jean-Michel Hautbois
<jeanmichel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23/10/2024 10:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:21:34 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was not really expecting you to review the m68k one no :-).
I think I have other issues which might have impact on ftrace too.
For instance, when I launch cyclictest I have a warning about HRTIMERS:
# cyclictest -p 99
WARN: stat /dev/cpu_dma_latency failed: No such file or directory
WARN: High resolution timers not available
policy: fifo: loadavg: 1.21 0.40 0.14 1/122 245

T: 0 (  245) P:99 I:1000 C:  11203 Min:     92 Act:  623 Avg:  775 Max:
     3516

The latencies are quite high...

Yes, if you don't have high resolution timers, the latency will be high.

According to my config, I should have those:
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y

Does your hardware have a high resolution timer, and do you have
a driver for it?

$ git grep hrtimer -- arch/m68k/
$


No, there is nothing with hrtimer. But, the architecture has four dma timers, with a 8ns resolution at 125MHz says the documentation. I will try to find a way to implement the missing part.


I gave it a hacky try. And it seems to be *a lot* better:
# cyclictest -p 99 -l 10000
WARN: stat /dev/cpu_dma_latency failed: No such file or directory
policy: fifo: loadavg: 1.18 0.71 0.33 1/122 258

T: 0 ( 258) P:99 I:1000 C: 10000 Min: 118 Act: 1104 Avg: 418 Max: 1858

I will try to clean it a bit for another patch set :-).

Thanks,
JM




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux