Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] m68k: Handle __generic_copy_to_user faults more carefully

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, I wrote:

I will test it tomorrow. I expect that a NOP is needed at the end of 
__clear_user.


Everything seems to work now.

I tested this series together with my own RFC patch on a Quadra (68040) 
and IIci (68030). My tests covered getcwd and llseek syscalls. I tried a 
build with the extra call to __clear_user() and a build without it. And I 
covered a range of working directory names.

Tested-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So apparently there'e no need for a NOP at the end of __clear_user() -- on 
'040 and '030 at least.





[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux