Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

First of all, please read this
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces-in-commit-messages
and amend the commit message accordingly.


Right -- the call chain is described in the commit log message so the 
backtrace does not add value. And the timestamps, stack dump etc. are 
irrelevant.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Second, please move these Cc to be after the '---' line


I thought they were placed above the line for audit (and signing) 
purposes. There are thousands of Cc lines in the mainline commit messages 
since v6.8.

Link: https://github.com/vivier/qemu-m68k/issues/44
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1078874617.9746.36.camel@gaston/

Missed Fixes tag?


Would this be ok: Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
I have to ask because some reviewers do not like to see a Fixes tag cite 
that commit.

Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
(here is a good location for Cc:)


Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should be 
above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this convention 
changed recently?

Thanks for your review.




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux