On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:44:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:17 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
+ select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
select ERRATA_ANDES if RISCV_SBI
select ERRATA_ANDES_CMO if ERRATA_ANDES
Since this Kconfig menu has changed a bit in linux-next, the selects
are unconditional here, and ERRATA_ANDES_CMO will in turn select
RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT.
Oh, looks like another patch landed there in linux-next. I had
waited for the previous one go go upstream in -rc6. Not sure
how to best handle this conflict.
I think the easiest is to ask soc to apply this series?
I don't think pulling all the DMA bits into a random other tree
would be a good idea. I can hand off the first few bits, but I'd
need a stable branch to pull in after that. Which of the half a dozen
soc trees we have in linux-next is this anyway?
