On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:25 AM Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:04:56PM -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
As part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
ptdesc equivalents, convert various page table functions to use ptdescs.
Some of the functions use the *get*page*() helper functions. Convert
these to use pagetable_alloc() and ptdesc_address() instead to help
standardize page tables further.
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 4 +-
arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h | 4 +-
arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
...
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
index d7374add7820..07fc660a24aa 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgalloc.c
...
@@ -488,16 +486,20 @@ static void base_pgt_free(unsigned long *table)
static unsigned long *base_crst_alloc(unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long *table;
+ struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
- table = (unsigned long *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, CRST_ALLOC_ORDER);
- if (table)
- crst_table_init(table, val);
+ ptdesc = pagetable_alloc(GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM, CRST_ALLOC_ORDER);
I guess I must miss something, but what is the reason to mask out
__GFP_HIGHMEM here? It is not part of GFP_KERNEL, nor does s390 support
HIGHMEM.
You're not missing anything.
This was replacing __get_free_pages() which also doesn't support HIGHMEM,
so I had that in to ensure a non-HIGHMEM allocation in case a
passed-in gfp_flags
had it set. In hindsight since we're just passing in the GFP flags
directly here, we don't
actually need to mask out GFP_HIGHMEM.