Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 19 2023 at 15:21, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 19/09/2023 14:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If you're working on one of them, then surely it's a simple matter of
> > working on adding CONFIG_PREEMPT support :-)
>
> In the case of UML adding preempt will be quite difficult. I looked at
> this a few years back.

What's so difficult about it?

Thanks,

        tglx