Re: arch/m68k/include/asm/mmu_context.h:164 load_ksp_mmu() warn: unsigned 'mmuar' is never less than zero.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023, kernel test robot wrote:

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   c17414a273b81fe4e34e11d69fc30cc8b1431614
commit: e67b37c368b7cc24b8c0fe5ab6c44422312eab37 m68k: allow pte_offset_map[_lock]() to fail
date:   2 weeks ago
config: m68k-randconfig-m031-20230706 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230706/202307061849.rJKwVbXb-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230706/202307061849.rJKwVbXb-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307061849.rJKwVbXb-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

New smatch warnings:
arch/m68k/include/asm/mmu_context.h:164 load_ksp_mmu() warn: unsigned 'mmuar' is never less than zero.

Old smatch warnings:
arch/m68k/include/asm/mmu_context.h:114 load_ksp_mmu() warn: always true condition '(mmuar >= (0)) => (0-u32max >= 0)'
arch/m68k/include/asm/mmu_context.h:140 load_ksp_mmu() warn: always true condition '(mmuar >= (0)) => (0-u32max >= 0)'

vim +/mmuar +164 arch/m68k/include/asm/mmu_context.h

    92	
    93	static inline void load_ksp_mmu(struct task_struct *task)
    94	{
    95		unsigned long flags;
    96		struct mm_struct *mm;
    97		int asid;
    98		pgd_t *pgd;
    99		p4d_t *p4d;
   100		pud_t *pud;
   101		pmd_t *pmd;
   102		pte_t *pte = NULL;
   103		unsigned long mmuar;
   104	
   105		local_irq_save(flags);
   106		mmuar = task->thread.ksp;
   107	
   108		/* Search for a valid TLB entry, if one is found, don't remap */
   109		mmu_write(MMUAR, mmuar);
   110		mmu_write(MMUOR, MMUOR_STLB | MMUOR_ADR);
   111		if (mmu_read(MMUSR) & MMUSR_HIT)
   112			goto end;
   113	
   114		if (mmuar >= PAGE_OFFSET) {
   115			mm = &init_mm;
   116		} else {
   117			pr_info("load_ksp_mmu: non-kernel mm found: 0x%p\n", task->mm);
   118			mm = task->mm;
   119		}
   120	
   121		if (!mm)
   122			goto bug;
   123	
   124		pgd = pgd_offset(mm, mmuar);
   125		if (pgd_none(*pgd))
   126			goto bug;
   127	
   128		p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, mmuar);
   129		if (p4d_none(*p4d))
   130			goto bug;
   131	
   132		pud = pud_offset(p4d, mmuar);
   133		if (pud_none(*pud))
   134			goto bug;
   135	
   136		pmd = pmd_offset(pud, mmuar);
   137		if (pmd_none(*pmd))
   138			goto bug;
   139	
   140		pte = (mmuar >= PAGE_OFFSET) ? pte_offset_kernel(pmd, mmuar)
   141					     : pte_offset_map(pmd, mmuar);
   142		if (!pte || pte_none(*pte) || !pte_present(*pte))
   143			goto bug;
   144	
   145		set_pte(pte, pte_mkyoung(*pte));
   146		asid = mm->context & 0xff;
   147		if (!pte_dirty(*pte) && mmuar <= PAGE_OFFSET)
   148			set_pte(pte, pte_wrprotect(*pte));
   149	
   150		mmu_write(MMUTR, (mmuar & PAGE_MASK) | (asid << MMUTR_IDN) |
   151			(((int)(pte->pte) & (int)CF_PAGE_MMUTR_MASK)
   152			>> CF_PAGE_MMUTR_SHIFT) | MMUTR_V);
   153	
   154		mmu_write(MMUDR, (pte_val(*pte) & PAGE_MASK) |
   155			((pte->pte) & CF_PAGE_MMUDR_MASK) | MMUDR_SZ_8KB | MMUDR_X);
   156	
   157		mmu_write(MMUOR, MMUOR_ACC | MMUOR_UAA);
   158	
   159		goto end;
   160	
   161	bug:
   162		pr_info("ksp load failed: mm=0x%p ksp=0x08%lx\n", mm, mmuar);
   163	end:
 > 164		if (pte && mmuar < PAGE_OFFSET)
   165			pte_unmap(pte);
   166		local_irq_restore(flags);
   167	}
   168	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

I'm sorry, it appears that I've increased the number of smatch warnings on
m68k: but since it was already complaining about "mmuar >= PAGE_OFFSET"s
there, I'm not going to feel very guilty about my "mmuar < PAGE_OFFSET";
and I've no idea of the significance of PAGE_OFFSET 0 on m68k.  Over to
you - but I expect ignoring this will continue to be the right answer :)

Thanks,
Hugh



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux