Re: API for setting multiple PTEs at once

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dienstag, 14. Februar 2023 10:55:43 CET Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
Hi Matthew,

On 2/7/23 21:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:14:23PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
For those of you not subscribed, linux-mm is currently discussing
how best to handle page faults on large folios.  I simply made it work
when adding large folio support.  Now Yin Fengwei is working on
making it fast.

OK, here's an actual implementation:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230207194937.122543-3-willy@infradead.o
rg/

It survives a run of xfstests.  If your architecture doesn't store its
PFNs at PAGE_SHIFT, you're going to want to implement your own set_ptes(),
or you'll see entirely the wrong pages mapped into userspace.  You may
also wish to implement set_ptes() if it can be done more efficiently
than __pte(pteval(pte) + PAGE_SIZE).

Architectures that implement things like flush_icache_page() and
update_mmu_cache() may want to propose batched versions of those.
That's alpha, csky, m68k, mips, nios2, parisc, sh,
arm, loongarch, openrisc, powerpc, riscv, sparc and xtensa.
Maintainers BCC'd, mailing lists CC'd.

I'm happy to collect implementations and submit them as part of a v6.

Please find below the riscv implementation for set_ptes:

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index ebee56d47003..10bf812776a4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -463,6 +463,20 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
         __set_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pteval);
  }

+#define set_ptes set_ptes
+static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+                           pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
+{
+       for (;;) {
+               set_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
+               if (--nr == 0)
+                       break;
+               ptep++;
+               addr += PAGE_SIZE;
+               pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) + (1 << _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT));
+       }
+}

Given that this is the same code as the original version (surprise!), what 
about doing something like this in the generic code instead:

#ifndef PTE_PAGE_STEP
#define PTE_PAGE_STEP PAGE_SIZE
#endif

[…]

+               pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) + PTE_PAGE_STEP);

The name of the define is an obvious candidate for bike-shedding, feel free to 
name it as you want.

Or if that isn't sound enough maybe introduce something like:

static inline pte_t
set_ptes_next_pte(pte_t pte)
{
	return __pte(pte_val(pte) + (1 << _PAGE_PFN_SHIFT));
}

Greetings,

Eike
-- 
Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com
Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11
Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160
Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055

emlix - smart embedded open source

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux