On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:29:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
@@ -1010,14 +1009,21 @@ static int ads7846_setup_pendown(struct spi_device *spi,
}
ts->gpio_pendown = pdata->gpio_pendown;
-
- if (pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce)
- gpio_set_debounce(pdata->gpio_pendown,
- pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
Can we please change only this to:
gpiod_set_debounce(gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio_pendown),
pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
and not change anything else (i.e. drop the changes below)?
Probably. I can try rollback this.
} else {
- dev_err(&spi->dev, "no get_pendown_state nor gpio_pendown?\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ struct gpio_desc *desc;
+
+ desc = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "pendown", GPIOD_IN);
+ if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
+ dev_err(&spi->dev, "no get_pendown_state nor gpio_pendown?\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(desc);
+ }
+ gpiod_set_consumer_name(desc, "ads7846_pendown");
+
+ ts->gpio_pendown = desc_to_gpio(desc);
}
+ if (pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce)
+ gpiod_set_debounce(gpio_to_desc(ts->gpio_pendown),
+ pdata->gpio_pendown_debounce);
return 0;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko