Add m68k seccomp definitions to seccomp_bpf self test code. Tested on ARAnyM. Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> -- Changes from v12: Michael Karcher: - use correct definition of ARCH_REGS (use of struct pt_regs cause stack overflow on passing register set to user space due to size mismatch, and has some register offsets wrong) --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 9c2f448bb3a9..e222dc113c4b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ struct seccomp_data { # define __NR_seccomp 337 # elif defined(__sh__) # define __NR_seccomp 372 +# elif defined(__mc68000__) +# define __NR_seccomp 380 # else # warning "seccomp syscall number unknown for this architecture" # define __NR_seccomp 0xffff @@ -1838,6 +1840,10 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_poke, getpid_runs_normally) # define ARCH_REGS struct pt_regs # define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) (_regs).regs[3] # define SYSCALL_RET(_regs) (_regs).regs[0] +#elif defined(__mc68000__) +# define ARCH_REGS struct user_regs_struct +# define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) (_regs).orig_d0 +# define SYSCALL_RET(_regs) (_regs).d0 #else # error "Do not know how to find your architecture's registers and syscalls" #endif @@ -1902,7 +1908,7 @@ const bool ptrace_entry_set_syscall_ret = * Use PTRACE_GETREGS and PTRACE_SETREGS when available. This is useful for * architectures without HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK (e.g. User-mode Linux). */ -#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__mips__) +#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__mips__) || defined(__mc68000__) # define ARCH_GETREGS(_regs) ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS, tracee, 0, &(_regs)) # define ARCH_SETREGS(_regs) ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGS, tracee, 0, &(_regs)) #else -- 2.17.1