[PATCH linux-next] m68k: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));

 #if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM)
-	strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
-	command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0;
+	strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
 #endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */

 	process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
-- 
2.15.2



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux