On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 07:03:31PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:00:52PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:52:54AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index 4608cc962ecf..e1d40ca341b7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -436,12 +436,11 @@ static inline vm_fault_t do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int access)
/* The fault is fully completed (including releasing mmap lock) */
if (fault & VM_FAULT_COMPLETED) {
- /*
- * Gmap will need the mmap lock again, so retake it. TODO:
- * only conditionally take the lock when CONFIG_PGSTE set.
- */
- mmap_read_lock(mm);
- goto out_gmap;
+ if (gmap) {
+ mmap_read_lock(mm);
+ goto out_gmap;
+ }
fault = 0; <----
+ goto out;
Hmm, right after I replied I found "goto out" could be problematic, since
all s390 callers of do_exception() will assume it an error condition (side
note: "goto out_gmap" contains one step to clear "fault" to 0). I'll
replace this with "return 0" instead if it looks good to both of you.
I'll wait for a confirmation before reposting. Thanks,
Right, that was stupid. Thanks for double checking!
However could you please add "fault = 0" just in front of the goto out
like above? I'd like to avoid having returns and gotos mixed.
Sure thing.
--
Peter Xu
