On 5/26/2022 5:42 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi,
On 5/25/22 07:48, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
As per asm-generic definition and other architectures __fls should
return unsigned long.
No functional change is expected as return value should fit in unsigned
long.
Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński<amadeuszx.slawinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to for-curr.
Thx,
-Vineet
And apparently __fls is defined in two places in ARC header and I only
changed one, should I send incremental patch on top of already merged
one or v2?