Hi Borislav,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:59 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you
or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say.
Which would you like?
We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you
might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a
new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is
appreciated. :)
Okay, no problem. I'll make the change there and get_cycles() for v+1
of the patchset.
Jason
