Re: [PATCH RFC v1 07/10] arm64: use sched_clock() for random_get_entropy() instead of zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:21:42PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
In the event that random_get_entropy() can't access a cycle counter or
similar, falling back to returning 0 is really not the best we can do.
Instead, at least calling sched_clock() would be preferable, because
that always needs to return _something_, even falling back to jiffies
eventually. It's not as though sched_clock() is super high precision or
guaranteed to be entropic, but basically anything that's not zero all
the time is better than returning zero all the time.

If CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER=n, then get_cycles() will return 0, so we only
need the fallback code for that case.

In arch/arm64/Kconfig we unconditionally select CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER,
so that configuration shouldn't be possible, and I don't think this
patch is necessary.

On arm64 we depend on the architected timer in a bunch of places, so
anyone hacking that out has bigger problems.

Thanks for the tip. I'll drop this patch from the series.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux