RE: [PATCH v2 05/18] x86: remove __range_not_ok()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Christoph Hellwig
Sent: 18 February 2022 06:29
...

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 15b058eefc4e..ee117fcf46ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ copy_stack_frame(const struct stack_frame_user __user *fp,
 {
 	int ret;

-	if (__range_not_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame), TASK_SIZE))
+	if (!__access_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame)))
 		return 0;

Just switch the __get_user calls below to get_user instead.

Is this worth doing at all?
How much userspace code is actually compiled with stack frames?

Won't work well for a 32bit process on a 64bit kernel either.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux