Re: RFC: remove set_fs for m68k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 08:54:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:43 PM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

having run stress tests on a kernel with Al Viro's signal handling fixes
applied for the past two days with no further errors, I am now quite
confident that the format error I saw in resume_userspace() and a bus
error in setup_frame() were caused by multiple pending signals, and the
resulting stack mangling that Al's patches fix.

Sounds good. Except you say "Al Viro's signal handling fixes" without
giving any context, so I have no idea which patches you are referring
to.

Regardless, if there's some fixes queue that also removes set_fs()
from m68k, I'm willing to take it for 5.15 just to have another
architecture down and done with.

And even if the set_fs() patches might still be under discussion, the
format errors have been going on for some time, so the signal fixes -
wherever they are - seem to be no-brainers if they fix those.

	vfs.git #{untested,fixes}.m68k, series posted to m68k folks back in July.
3 commits in there, and I've some local followup cleanups (ifdefs in m68k/signal.c
are bloody confused), but the latter got stalled by ptrace and signal review and
documentation writing...

	See https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/YP2dTQPm1wGPWFgD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
for original thread.



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux