Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 13:53:50 +0200
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <db43bef1-7938-4fc1-853d-c20d66521329@gmail.com> (Michael Schmitz's message of "Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:44:11 +1200")
References: <1624407696-20180-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <87zgunzovm.fsf@disp2133> <3b4f287b-7be2-0e7b-ae5a-6c11972601fb@gmail.com> <1b656c02-925c-c4ba-03d3-f56075cdfac5@gmail.com> <8735scvklk.fsf@disp2133> <e9009e13-cfec-c494-0b3b-f334f75cd1e4@gmail.com> <af434994-5c61-0e3a-c7bc-3ed966ccb44f@gmail.com> <87h7gopvz2.fsf@disp2133> <328e59fb-3e8c-e4cd-06b4-1975ce98614a@gmail.com> <877dhio13t.fsf@disp2133> <12992a3c-0740-f90e-aa4e-1ec1d8ea38f6@gmail.com> <87tukkk6h3.fsf@disp2133> <df6618bf-d1bc-4759-2d14-934c22d54a83@gmail.com> <87eebn7w7y.fsf@igel.home> <db43bef1-7938-4fc1-853d-c20d66521329@gmail.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

On Jul 25 2021, Michael Schmitz wrote:

I don't see that in ARAnyM.


ARAnyM lacks a lot in its fpu emulation.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
  - From: Michael Schmitz

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
Next by Date: [PATCH] m68k: Fix invalid RMW_INSNS on CPUs that lack CAS
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] signal/m68k: Use force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) in fpsp040_die
Next by thread: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add kernel seccomp support for m68k
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Video for Linux] [Yosemite News] [Linux S/390] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]