Re: RFC: remove set_fs for m68k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 07:12:45AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
That confirms my guess - can we rely on the call trace in that case? And 
how does overwriting kernel code at that address tee up with the kernel 
still happily chugging along?

So if you remove the WARN_ON everything keeps running just fine?  I
wonder if in_interrupt somehow is not exact in m68k.  Or we actually
call it from an interrupt.  Let me try to unwind the various call
chains.



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux