Re: [PATCH] m68k/kernel - wire up syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Adrian,

the deeper I dig into kernel support for seccomp, the nastier it gets. Skipping a syscall after checks in syscall_trace_enter was just the easy part.

I now have something that compiles and survives a boot test on ARAnyM, but it's been entirely untested otherwise.

Will send v4 of the entry.S patch, and send the remaining seccomp stuff as a separate patch.

Cheers,

    Michael




On 15/06/21 11:04 am, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 6/15/21 12:11 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
working on entry.S recently, I was reminded of this one. It's never been applied, and I can't find a trace of it in my tree.

Not sure how far Adrian got with seccomp support testing, so I'm uncertain this is still of interest ...
I still have a fork of libseccomp with m68k support and my SH support patch
was merged upstream.

So, if you guys can get the kernel bits in place, I can take care of libseccomp.

Adrian




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux