On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 1:26 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and then in gdb you just do
b main
run
Btw, this extra stage is unnecessary, but if I just do that "catch
syscall group:process" before the process has even started, gdb gets
confused at the start.
You could skip this and just do "catch syscall exit_group" and then "run".
I used that "group:process" just to catch both the legacy "exit" and
the new "exit_group", but then it catches fork/execve too, and I think
that's what confuses gdb when it happens as you start the process.
Just to clarify why I did that odd thing.
Linus
