Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: io_mm.h - add APNE 100 MBit support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

Thanks for reviewing this one as well!

Am 07.06.2021 um 20:01 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Michael,

On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 7:54 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add code to support 10 Mbit and 100 Mbit mode for APNE driver.

A new ISA type ISA_TYPE_AG100 switches the Amiga ISA inb accessor
to word access as required by the 100 Mbit cards.

missing "dynamically".

OK...



Patch modified after patch "[PATCH RFC net-next] Amiga PCMCIA
100 MBit card support" submitted to netdev 2018/09/16 by Alex
Kazik <alex@xxxxxxxx>.

Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@
 #define ISA_TYPE_Q40  (1)
 #define ISA_TYPE_AG   (2)
 #define ISA_TYPE_ENEC (3)
+#define ISA_TYPE_AG100 (4)     /* for 100 MBit APNE card */

As this type may be needed for other cards, perhaps it should be
named after what it really does, i.e. always using 16-bit accesses?
ISA_TYPE_AG16?

Yep, that sounds better.


+
+#if defined(CONFIG_APNE100MBIT)

#ifdef

+#define MULTI_ISA 1
+#endif

 #if defined(CONFIG_Q40) && !defined(MULTI_ISA)
 #define ISA_TYPE ISA_TYPE_Q40
@@ -135,6 +140,9 @@ static inline u8 __iomem *isa_itb(unsigned long addr)
 #ifdef CONFIG_Q40
     case ISA_TYPE_Q40: return (u8 __iomem *)Q40_ISA_IO_B(addr);
 #endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_APNE100MBIT)

#ifdef

+    case ISA_TYPE_AG100: fallthrough;

Fallthrough to what? Oh, to ISA_TYPE_AG.
Please make this clear, and safer, by moving this inside the #ifdef
below (CONFIG_APNE100MBIT depends on CONFIG_AMIGA_PCMCIA).

OK, good point.

+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_AMIGA_PCMCIA
     case ISA_TYPE_AG: return (u8 __iomem *)AG_ISA_IO_B(addr);
 #endif

@@ -212,13 +232,16 @@ static inline u16 __iomem *isa_mtw(unsigned long addr)
 }


-#define isa_inb(port)      in_8(isa_itb(port))

Why move it below? Because its comment does not apply to the below?

Because the new form depends on isa_inw()? I've seen order matter in CPP statements before ...

 #define isa_inw(port)      (ISA_SEX ? in_be16(isa_itw(port)) : in_le16(isa_itw(port)))
 #define isa_inl(port)      (ISA_SEX ? in_be32(isa_itl(port)) : in_le32(isa_itl(port)))
 #define isa_outb(val,port) out_8(isa_itb(port),(val))
 #define isa_outw(val,port) (ISA_SEX ? out_be16(isa_itw(port),(val)) : out_le16(isa_itw(port),(val)))
 #define isa_outl(val,port) (ISA_SEX ? out_be32(isa_itl(port),(val)) : out_le32(isa_itl(port),(val)))

+/* for APNE 100 Mbit cards - hope the APNE 100 case will be eliminated as
+ * dead code if MULTI_ISA is not set */

I don't think this comment is needed.

I'll remove it, then.

Cheers,

	Michael



+#define isa_inb(port)      ((ISA_TYPE == ISA_TYPE_AG100) ? ((port) & 1 ? isa_inw((port) - 1) & 0xff : isa_inw(port) >> 8) : in_8(isa_itb(port))
+
 #define isa_readb(p)       in_8(isa_mtb((unsigned long)(p)))
 #define isa_readw(p)       \
        (ISA_SEX ? in_be16(isa_mtw((unsigned long)(p))) \

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux