Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] perf/core: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on SIGTRAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 4:10 PM 'Marco Elver' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Encode information from breakpoint attributes into siginfo_t, which
helps disambiguate which breakpoint fired.

Note, providing the event fd may be unreliable, since the event may have
been modified (via PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES) between the event
triggering and the signal being delivered to user space.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 8718763045fd..d7908322d796 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6296,6 +6296,17 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event)
        info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
        info.si_code = TRAP_PERF;
        info.si_errno = event->attr.type;
+
+       switch (event->attr.type) {
+       case PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT:
+               info.si_addr = (void *)(unsigned long)event->attr.bp_addr;
+               info.si_perf = (event->attr.bp_len << 16) | (u64)event->attr.bp_type;
+               break;
+       default:
+               /* No additional info set. */

Should we prohibit using attr.sigtrap for !PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT if we
don't know what info to pass yet?

I don't think it's necessary. This way, by default we get support for
other perf events. If user space observes si_perf==0, then there's no
information available. That would require that any event type that
sets si_perf in future, must ensure that it sets si_perf!=0.

I can add a comment to document the requirement here (and user space
facing documentation should get a copy of how the info is encoded,
too).

Alternatively, we could set si_errno to 0 if no info is available, at
the cost of losing the type information for events not explicitly
listed here.

What do you prefer?

Ah, I see.
Let's wait for the opinions of other people. There are a number of
options for how to approach this.

+               break;
+       }
+
        force_sig_info(&info);
 }

--
2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/CANpmjNP1wQvG0SNPP2L9QO%3Dnatf0XU8HXj-r2_-U4QZxtr-dVA%40mail.gmail.com.



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux