Re: [PATCH 12/14] scsi: NCR5380: Remove in_interrupt().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 29 Nov 2020, Michael Schmitz wrote:

Am 28.11.20 um 10:48 schrieb Finn Thain:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Finn Thain wrote:

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
index d654a6cc4162..739def70cffb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
@@ -223,7 +223,10 @@ static int NCR5380_poll_politely2(struct NCR5380_hostdata *hostdata,
 		cpu_relax();
 	} while (n--);
 
-	if (irqs_disabled() || in_interrupt())
+	/* We can't sleep when local irqs are disabled and callers ensure
+	 * that local irqs are disabled whenever we can't sleep.
+	 */
+	if (irqs_disabled())
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	/* Repeatedly sleep for 1 ms until deadline */

Michael, Andreas, would you please confirm that this is workable on 
Atari? The driver could sleep when IPL == 2 because 
arch_irqs_disabled_flags() would return false (on Atari). I'm 
wondering whether that would deadlock.

Pretty sure this would deadlock when in interrupt context here.

When in interrupt context, irqs_disabled() is true due to 
spinlock_irqsave/restore() in NCR5380_intr().

My question was really about what would happen if we sleep with IPL == 2.

Otherwise, IPL 2 is perfectly OK (which is why 
arch_irqs_disabled_flags() returns false in that case).

If you want to be 100% certain, I can give this one a spin.


Please only test it if you think it will work.

Cheers,

    Michael


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux