Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address
From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 00:17:56 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philip Blundell <philb@xxxxxxx>, Joshua Thompson <funaho@xxxxxxxxx>, Sam Creasey <sammy@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.23.453.2010100857270.12@nippy.intranet>
References: <20201009095621.833192-1-laurent@vivier.eu> <alpine.LNX.2.23.453.2010100857270.12@nippy.intranet>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

Le 09/10/2020 à 23:59, Finn Thain a écrit :

On Fri, 9 Oct 2020, Laurent Vivier wrote:

This information is unused since the discontinuous memory support
has been introduced in 2007.

Fixes: 12d810c1b8c2 ("m68k: discontinuous memory support")


Does this qualify as a bug fix?


It's more like a cleanup for 12d810c1b8c2 than a bug fix.

Thanks,
Laurent

References:
- [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address
  - From: Laurent Vivier
- Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address
  - From: Finn Thain

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/13] timekeeping: add CONFIG_LEGACY_TIMER_TICK
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: allow to configure PREEMPT_NONE, PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY on kernel command line
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Video for Linux] [Yosemite News] [Linux S/390] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux