On 13/5/20 9:59 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 17:09, Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ulf,
On 7/5/20 7:13 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+ Geert
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 01:54, Angelo Dureghello
<angelo.dureghello@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add support for sdhci-edshc mmc controller.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes for v3:
- removed volatile cast from clk.c
---
arch/m68k/coldfire/clk.c | 15 ++++++++++
arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--
arch/m68k/coldfire/m5441x.c | 12 +++++++-
arch/m68k/include/asm/m5441xsim.h | 19 ++++++++++++
arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfclk.h | 2 ++
include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-mcf.h | 17 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-mcf.h
Not sure what's the best way to deal with this patch. I looped in
Geert to get some input.
If it looks okay and the risk is minimal for conflicts, I can carry it
via my tree, but then I need an ack from Geert.
I can carry just this patch in the m68knommu git tree it you prefer.
Should be no conflicts that way. But really if you want to carry it
with all the others I don't have a problem with that either.
It looks like the new platform data header file is being used by the
mmc patch in 3/3, so it's probably easiest if I take them all via my
mmc tree.
Anyway, I will wait for a v4 from Angelo to address the comments.
Ok, no problem.
Regards
Greg
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
