Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: Move pt_mm within struct page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matthew,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:44 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Instead of a per-arch word within struct page, use a formerly reserved
word.  This word is shared with page->mapping, so it must be cleared
before being freed as it is checked in free_pages().

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -149,11 +149,8 @@ struct page {
                                        pgtable_t pmd_huge_pte;
                                };
                        };
-                       unsigned long _pt_pad_2;        /* mapping */
-                       union {
-                               struct mm_struct *pt_mm; /* x86 pgds only */
-                               atomic_t pt_frag_refcount; /* powerpc */
-                       };
+                       struct mm_struct *pt_mm;
+                       atomic_t pt_frag_refcount; /* powerpc */

So here is now an implicit hole on 64-bit platforms, right?
Do we have any where alignof(long) != 8?

 #if ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
                        spinlock_t *ptl;
 #else

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux