Re: BigRAMPlus seems to be detected now

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:06 AM Stefan Reinauer
<stefan.k.reinauer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 3:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As well as trying to boot it with the BRP as primary memory (BRP first
in memfile) or sole memory (motherboard RAM disabled in memfile).

With BigramPlus as sole memory the system can't seem to deal with the
initramfs (see log)

However, according to this log you have both enabled:

On node 0 totalpages: 4096
  DMA zone: 40 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:0

16 MiB

On node 1 totalpages: 65536
  DMA zone: 640 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 65536 pages, LIFO batch:15

256 MiB

SLUB: Unable to allocate memory from node 0
SLUB: Allocating a useless per node structure in order to be able to continue
SLUB: HWalign=16, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=8

Probably the 16 MiB in the first chunk is too small to allocate
page tables from, especially if it contains the initramfs.

What happens if you put the BRP first in the memfile?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux