On 02/24/2020 03:39 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Anshuman,
Thanks for your patch!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 7:22 AM Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It is unlikely that an inaccessible VMA without required permission flags
will get a page fault. Hence lets just append unlikely() directive to such
Why? Isn't it the idea that you get a page fault when the page is not
accessible?
Yeah it is. But the point here is to have a directive indicating that it is
unlikely that such scenarios will exist frequently even though they are very
much possible.
checks in order to improve performance while also standardizing it across
various platforms.
Does it make a difference to add these? Have you benchmarked this?
https://lwn.net/Articles/420019/
I dont have access to these platforms. As I had noted down previously, this
was only build tested. The primary motivation was that the likeliness or
rather unlikeliness for page faults on inaccessible VMAs are more workload
specific. Hence should not be platform dependent and this change was just
trying to make it similar in some platforms.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
