On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:30:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:34 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:56:40AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
(in all patches)
I can fix that (the From?) up while applying.
I'm not sure where that warning comes from, but if you feel it needs
fixing, sure. I normally only add the (Intel) thing to the SoB. I've so
far never had complaints about that.
Checkpatch doesn't like this.
Ooh, I see, that's a relatively new warning, pretty daft if you ask me.
Now I have to rediscover how I went about teaching checkpatch to STFU ;-)
Joe, should that '$email eq $author' not ignore rfc822 comments? That
Argh, that's me hitting on the wrong 'nominal' in checkpatch.pl, same
difference though.
is:
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
are, in actual fact, the same.
