Replying to my own patch with two more questions:
On 08/11/2019 05:36 PM, Max Staudt wrote:
- /* allocate host */
- host = ata_host_alloc(&z->dev, nr_ports);
Actually, this is an issue even the existing pata_buddha has: ata_host_alloc() will dev_set_drvdata(dev, host) which is fine on Buddha and Catweasel, but conflicts with zorro8390's own dev_set_drvdata() on an X-Surf board. Thus, if both pata_buddha and zorro8390 are active, only one can be unloaded. The original ide/buddha driver does not have this problem as far as I can see.
This should be resolved once we get around to MFD support, as Geert suggested.
Shall we leave this as-is, as it's not really a change from the status quo in pata_buddha?
+static int __init pata_buddha_late_init(void)
+{
+ struct zorro_dev *z = NULL;
+
+ pr_info("pata_buddha: Scanning for stand-alone IDE controllers...\n");
+ zorro_register_driver(&pata_buddha_driver);
+
+ pr_info("pata_buddha: Scanning for X-Surf boards...\n");
+ while ((z = zorro_find_device(ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, z))) {
+ static struct zorro_device_id xsurf_ent =
+ { ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, BOARD_XSURF};
+
+ pata_buddha_probe(z, &xsurf_ent);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
This is suboptimal, as we don't release memory in case pata_buddha_probe() fails. Any suggestions?
+static void __exit pata_buddha_exit(void)
+{
+ struct zorro_dev *z = NULL;
+
+ pr_info("pata_buddha: Releasing X-Surf boards...\n");
+ while ((z = zorro_find_device(ZORRO_PROD_INDIVIDUAL_COMPUTERS_X_SURF, z))) {
+ struct ata_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(&z->dev);
+
+ if (host)
+ ata_host_detach(host);
+ }
I guess that here we also need to manually release the resources we allocated with devm_* above. Any ideas?
Thanks
Max
