On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 12:57:32AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
@@ -1442,8 +1464,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
while (1) {
- if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
+ if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
+ if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
+ return -EXDEV;
@@ -1468,6 +1493,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
return -ECHILD;
if (&mparent->mnt == nd->path.mnt)
break;
+ if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
+ return -EXDEV;
/* we know that mountpoint was pinned */
nd->path.dentry = mountpoint;
nd->path.mnt = &mparent->mnt;
@@ -1482,6 +1509,8 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
return -ECHILD;
if (!mounted)
break;
+ if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_XDEV))
+ return -EXDEV;
Are you sure these failure exits in follow_dotdot_rcu() won't give
suprious hard errors?
+ if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH)) {
+ error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
+ if (unlikely(error))
+ return ERR_PTR(error);
+ nd->root = nd->path;
+ if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU))
+ path_get(&nd->root);
+ }
if (*s == '/') {
if (likely(!nd->root.mnt))
set_root(nd);
@@ -2350,9 +2400,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
s = ERR_PTR(error);
return s;
}
- error = dirfd_path_init(nd);
- if (unlikely(error))
- return ERR_PTR(error);
+ if (likely(!nd->path.mnt)) {
Is that a weird way of saying "if we hadn't already called dirfd_path_init()"?
