Re: m68k build failures in -next: undefined reference to `arch_dma_prep_coherent'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:19:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Günter,

CC Greg

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:45 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:13:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:06 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see the following build error in -next:

kernel/dma/direct.o: In function `dma_direct_alloc_pages':
direct.c:(.text+0x4d8): undefined reference to `arch_dma_prep_coherent'

Example: m68k:allnoconfig.

Bisect log is ambiguous and points to the merge of m68k/for-next into
-next. Yet, I think the problem is with commit 69878ef47562 ("m68k:
Implement arch_dma_prep_coherent()") which is supposed to introduce
the function. The problem is likely that arch_dma_prep_coherent()
is only declared if CONFIG_MMU is enabled, but it is called from code
outside CONFIG_MMU.

Thanks, one more thing to fix in m68k-allnoconfig (did it really build
before?)...

Given you say "example", does it fail in real configs, too?

Yes, it does. All nommu builds fail. allnoconfig and tinyconfig just
happen to be among those.

Building m68k:allnoconfig ... failed
Building m68k:tinyconfig ... failed
Building m68k:m5272c3_defconfig ... failed
Building m68k:m5307c3_defconfig ... failed
Building m68k:m5249evb_defconfig ... failed
Building m68k:m5407c3_defconfig ... failed
Building m68k:m5475evb_defconfig ... failed

Error is always the same.

Thanks!

The error started with next-20190702. Prior to that, builds were fine,
including m68k:allnoconfig and m68k:tinyconfig.

Yeah, it started when I queued up the DMA rework.
I didn't double-check when Greg said it was OK for him, as it wouldn't affect
Coldfire or mmu. Sorry for that.
And that has just been pulled by Linus... Oops...


Oh well, I would have hoped for another rc, not because of the state
of mainline but for the state of -next. The next release may be fun,
in a negative sense. From the build of next-20190705:

Build results:
	total: 158 pass: 147 fail: 11
Qemu test results:
	total: 364 pass: 41 fail: 323

People have been making lots of last-minute (ie in the week before
the commit window opens, and just before a holiday weekend) untested
changes. Unfortunately that happens a lot lately.

To be fair, most of the qemu failures are due to messed up btrfs
dependencies (or at least I hope so - hard to say with that many
failures), but still ...

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux