Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!
I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with
attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall
fails with EINVAL.

Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it?

My bad, the LTP syscall wrapper handles ENOSYS and produces skipped
results based on that.

EINVAL is what you get for not yet implemented syscalls, i.e. new
syscall on old kernel.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux