On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed. Oleg.
On 05/23, Christian Brauner wrote:
So given that we would really need another find_next_open_fd() I think sticking to the simple cond_resched() version I sent before is better for now until we see real-world performance issues.
OK, agreed. Oleg.