Re: [PATCH] m68k: set proper major_num when specifying module param major_num

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hard to trigger (nfblock will be compiled in, for the vast majority of users) but a real bug - LGTM.

Tested-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>

Am 01.02.2019 um 16:26 schrieb Chengguang Xu:
When calling register_blkdev() with specified major
device number, the return code is 0 on success.
So it seems not correct direct assign return code to
variable major_num in this case.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c b/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
index 38049357d6d3..40712e49381b 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
@@ -155,18 +155,22 @@ static int __init nfhd_init_one(int id, u32 blocks, u32 bsize)
 static int __init nfhd_init(void)
 {
 	u32 blocks, bsize;
+	int ret;
 	int i;

 	nfhd_id = nf_get_id("XHDI");
 	if (!nfhd_id)
 		return -ENODEV;

-	major_num = register_blkdev(major_num, "nfhd");
-	if (major_num <= 0) {
+	ret = register_blkdev(major_num, "nfhd");
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_warn("nfhd: unable to get major number\n");
-		return major_num;
+		return ret;
 	}

+	if (!major_num)
+		major_num = ret;
+
 	for (i = NFHD_DEV_OFFSET; i < 24; i++) {
 		if (nfhd_get_capacity(i, 0, &blocks, &bsize))
 			continue;




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux