Hi Andrew,
no objection for you to pick this up as part as a larger cleanup. I've
tried to reconstruct how this happened (i.e. what other phy driver file
I used as a 'template' for asix.c) - all I can say is that the 2.0+
boiler plate text was in my initial commit, and the incorrect SPDX tag
was added in response to checkpath complaints. So 2.0+ would be correct.
Thomas: does that suit your purpose?
Cheers,
Michael
On 21/01/19 6:43 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:22:39AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Michael,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Michael Schmitz wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/asix.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Driver for Asix PHYs
+ *
+ * Author: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
+ * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
+ * option) any later version.
+ *
+ */
This license information is broken. The SPDX license identifier and the
boiler plate text are contradicting. The SPDX id is GPL v2 only and the
boiler plate says v2 or later.
Hi Thomas
Please see:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg544312.html
The first two patches are simple SPDX converstions. Then it gets
interesting trying to sort out license inconsistencies.
Andrew
