On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:19 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:01 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:
arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 12 ++++++++++++
I have some changes I'd like to make to our syscall table that will
clash with this.
I'll try and send them today.
Ok. Are those for 5.0 or 5.1? If they are intended for 5.0, it would be
nice for me to have a branch based on 5.0-rc1 that I can put
the other patches on top of.
There is also another change that I considered:
At the end of my series, we have a lot of entries like
245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
245 64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
245 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime
which could be folded into
245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
245 spu64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
if we just add another option to the ABI field. Any thoughts on
that?
So "spu64" would mean "spu + 64"?
That makes it more difficult to read, and to grep.
What about allowing multiple ABIs, separated by commas?
So that line would become:
245 spu,64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
I agree that would be a nice representation, but doing this would
again require changing the script, which then in turn clashes with
Firoz' patches to unify it under the scripts/ directory.
Arnd
