Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number
of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one
reason or another.

This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking
compatibility, doing a number of steps:

Thanks a lot!

- Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all
  architectures but that we definitely want there.

It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k.
Is that intentional?

Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I
forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with
time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in
64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both
io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit
architectures, I can add that as well.

Thanks, sounds fine to me.

Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should
add it?

     Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux