Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:14:29AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Yep, that is right. Certainly the MMU case is broken. Some noMMU cases work
by virtue of the SoC only having an instruction cache (the older V2 cores).

Is there a good an easy case to detect if a core has a cache?  Either
runtime or in Kconfig?

The MMU case is fixable, but I think it will mean changing away from
the fall-back virtual:physical 1:1 mapping it uses for the kernel address
space. So not completely trivial. Either that or a dedicated area of RAM
for coherent allocations that we can mark as non-cachable via the really
course grained and limited ACR registers - not really very appealing.

What about CF_PAGE_NOCACHE?  Reading arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgtable.h
suggest this would cause an uncached mapping, in which case something
like this should work:

	http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/4b8711d436e8d56edbc5ca19aa2be639705bbfef

The noMMU case in general is probably limited to something like that same
type of dedicated RAM/ACR register mechamism.

The most commonly used periperal with DMA is the FEC ethernet module,
and it has some "special" (used very loosely) cache flushing for
parts like the 532x family which probably makes it mostly work right.
There is a PCI bus on the 54xx family of parts, and I know general
ethernet cards on it (like e1000's) have problems I am sure are
related to the fact that coherent memory allocations aren't.

If we really just care about FEC we can just switch it do use
DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT and do explicit cache flushing.  But as far
as I can tell FEC only uses DMA coherent allocations for the TSO
headers anyway, is TSO even used on this SOC?



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux