On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:30:45PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
[...]
Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-
interpretation.rst?
As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer to how things
should be interpreted here.
Ugh, was not aware that there two documents.
Yeah, definitely sheds light. Why the documents could not be merged
to single common sense code of conduct?
The fact that we've arrived at essentially an original CoC
reinterpreted to the point where it's effectively a new CoC has been
the source of much debate and recrimination over the last few months
... you can read it in the ksummit-discuss archives, but I really think
we don't want to reopen that can of worms.
Got you... Well I now read the 2nd amendment now through, and yeah, kind
of way I work/function anyway.
Thank you for the patience...
/Jarkko
