On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:36:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 26-09-18 11:31:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_bootmem_node(),
which is done in the following patches.
/me confused. Why do we need this patch at all? Maybe it should be
folded into the later patch you are refereing here?
OK, I can see 1536927045-23536-17-git-send-email-rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
now. If you are going to repost for whatever reason please merge those
two. Also I would get rid of the implicit "0 implies SMP_CACHE_BYTES"
behavior. It is subtle and you have to dig deep to find that out. Why
not make it explicit?
Agree. I'd just prefer to make it a separate patch rather then resend the
whole series.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
