On 06.08.2018 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 3 August 2018 at 21:32, Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch adds support for ColdFire mcf5441x-family edma
module.
The ColdFire edma module is slightly different from fsl-edma,
so a new driver is added. But most of the code is common
between fsl-edma and mcf-edma so it has been collected into a
separate common module fsl-edma-common (patch 1/3).
Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/dma-mcf-edma.h b/include/linux/platform_data/dma-mcf-edma.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9a1819acb28f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/dma-mcf-edma.h
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Freescale eDMA platform data, ColdFire SoC's family.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __MACH_MCF_EDMA_H__
+#define __MACH_MCF_EDMA_H__
The guard should rather match current location, e.g.
__LINUX_PLATFORM_DATA_MCF_EDMA_H__
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
So this revision fixed the issue we had seen with the previous version?
Do we know what it was exactly?
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
