Hi Finn,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:56 PM Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, I wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I'd suggest we do it like below to make it consistent with the rest
again, using the 1904..2040 range of dates and no warning for invalid
dates.
If you agree, I'll send that as a proper patch.
Geert may instead wish to fixup or revert the patch he has committed
already...
Geert, how do you want to handle this?
Do you want a fixup patch or a v3 patch with the WARN_ON and the other two
issues addressed?
Please send a fixup patch, for the m68k/master branch, which is non-rebasing.
I'll fold it into the original commit on the m68k/for-next branch.
I'm willing to send either one if Arnd is okay with that. I'd really like
to resolve this before the merge window opens, since my PMU patch series
is affected.
+1. If it's not resolved (a few days) before the merge window opens, I may have
to revert the patch instead.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
