Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] m68k: switch to MEMBLOCK + NO_BOOTMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 04-07-18 15:43:35, Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 03d48d8835ba..2acec4033389 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size,
 		 * so we use WARN_ONCE() here to see the stack trace if
 		 * fail happens.
 		 */
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotunplug may be affected\n");
+		WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE),
+					"memblock: bottom-up allocation failed, memory hotremove may be affected\n");

nit: isn't the warning indented too much?

this is what vim did for me. The string doesn't fit into 80 even if I
indented it to the first bracket. If you feel strongly I can do that
though.

Not really. With wrapping if looks better like this :) 
 
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux