Hi Geert,
On 28/03/18 17:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[skip]
[PATCH] m68k: set dma and coherent masks for platform FEC ethernets
As of commit 205e1b7f51e4 ("dma-mapping: warn when there is no
coherent_dma_mask") the Freescale FEC driver is issuing the following
warning on driver initialization on ColdFire systems:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 0x40159e20
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7-dirty #4
Stack from 41833dd8:
41833dd8 40259c53 40025534 40279e26 00000003 00000000 4004e514 41827000
400255de 40244e42 00000204 40159e20 00000009 00000000 00000000 4024531d
40159e20 40244e42 00000204 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000007 00000000
00000000 40279e26 4028d040 40226576 4003ae88 40279e26 418273f6 41833ef8
7fffffff 418273f2 41867028 4003c9a2 4180ac6c 00000004 41833f8c 4013e71c
40279e1c 40279e26 40226c16 4013ced2 40279e26 40279e58 4028d040 00000000
Call Trace:
[<40025534>] 0x40025534
[<4004e514>] 0x4004e514
[<400255de>] 0x400255de
[<40159e20>] 0x40159e20
[<40159e20>] 0x40159e20
It is not fatal, the driver and the system continue to function normally.
As per the warning the coherent_dma_mask is not set on this device.
There is nothing special about the DMA memory coherency on this hardware
so we can just set the mask to 32bits in the platform data for the FEC
ethernet devices.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c
index 84938fd..f93e0e5 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/device.c
@@ -130,12 +130,18 @@
},
};
+static u64 mcf_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+
static struct platform_device mcf_fec0 = {
.name = FEC_NAME,
.id = 0,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mcf_fec0_resources),
.resource = mcf_fec0_resources,
- .dev.platform_data = FEC_PDATA,
+ .dev = {
+ .dma_mask = &mcf_dma_mask,
Can you make this &mcf_fec0.dev.coherent_dma_mask, removing the need for
mcf_dma_mask, or doesn't C allow that?
Yes, sure can. Looks like some other architectures do that too.
I'll change it. Thanks.
Regards
Greg
+ .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+ .platform_data = FEC_PDATA,
+ }
};
#ifdef MCFFEC_BASE1
@@ -167,7 +173,11 @@
.id = 1,
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mcf_fec1_resources),
.resource = mcf_fec1_resources,
- .dev.platform_data = FEC_PDATA,
+ .dev = {
+ .dma_mask = &mcf_dma_mask,
Likewise.
+ .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+ .platform_data = FEC_PDATA,
+ }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
