Hi Yamada-san,
CC sfr (conflict heads up)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2018-02-22 22:20 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ARM, ARM64 and UniCore32 define UL(x) like follows:
#define UL(x) _AC(x, UL)
While, M68K defines it differently:
#define UL(x) ((unsigned long) (x))
I want to move the former to a common header. Beforehand, this
commit renames the latter to avoid name conflict.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9498273/
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
- Split out as a prerequisite patch
arch/m68k/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/mm/init.c b/arch/m68k/mm/init.c
index e85acd1..583a8e5 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/mm/init.c
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ void free_initmem(void)
void __init print_memmap(void)
{
-#define UL(x) ((unsigned long) (x))
-#define MLK(b, t) UL(b), UL(t), (UL(t) - UL(b)) >> 10
-#define MLM(b, t) UL(b), UL(t), (UL(t) - UL(b)) >> 20
+#define TO_UL(x) ((unsigned long) (x))
+#define MLK(b, t) TO_UL(b), TO_UL(t), (TO_UL(t) - TO_UL(b)) >> 10
+#define MLM(b, t) TO_UL(b), TO_UL(t), (TO_UL(t) - TO_UL(b)) >> 20
#define MLK_ROUNDUP(b, t) b, t, DIV_ROUND_UP(((t) - (b)), 1024)
Please note that this code patch is scheduled for removal in v4.17, cfr.
"[PATCH] m68k/mm: Stop printing the virtual memory layout"
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/12/97).
I see, but I do not see it in linux-next as of writing.
It will be tomorrow.
Without this prerequisite, 3/5 would cause a build error.
So, I needed to include it in this series.
I am hoping this series will be picked up by Andrew Morton.
In my understanding, he applies patches on top of the linux-next.
I think either will happen:
[1] If your patch appears in linux-next first,
my 2/5 will be skipped, and the rest of the series will be applied.
[2] If my series is applied first,
Andrew will drop 2/5 when your patch appears in linux-next
(this is simply detected by patch conflict)
OK.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html