Re: [PATCH net v4 02/13] net/8390: Fix msg_enable patch snafu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, David Miller wrote:

From: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 22:08:43 -0500 (EST)

The lib8390 module parameter 'msg_enable' doesn't do anything useful:
it causes an ancient version string to be logged.

Not true.

You need to look at the various netif_*() et al. message logging
interfaces, they check "p->msg_enable" to determine which messages to
print.


I think you have overlooked those modules which offer no way to set 
p->msg_enable, i.e. ax88796, axnet_cs, etherh, hydra, mac8390, mcf8390, 
pcnet_cs and zorro8390.

The apne, ne, ne2k-pci, smc-ultra, stnic, and wd modules are not at issue 
here because they define their own msg_enable parameters and they also 
assign p->msg_enable accordingly.

I'm not applying this, sorry.


Please take another look.

Just for the record, I consider these kinds of ancient driver cleanups 
painful to review, and unless they allow some ugly global kernel API to 
be improved or removed such changes have very little gain.


OK. When there are no users, I'll send you no patches.

But even then, I may continue to send patches to other maintainers who may 
be open to the possibility of unforeseen future uses of the body of 
contributed code under their care.

In fact, most of them have a good chance to break things.


You saw the tested-by tags, right? Anyway, if you consider my previous 
work, I believe you'll find that I've fixed more bugs than I've 
introduced.

It is especially a dubious sequence when you cluster so many of these 
things together into a large patch series.


Sorry if that gave the wrong impression. Doing that made my workflow 
easier.

If you are really serious about fixing real bugs, post these one at a 
time, very slowly, for us to review properly and apply.

Thank you.

Please don't feel like I'm trying to pressure you to expedite this.

FWIW, this submission was arranged so that you might cherry-pick the first 
N patches, for some satisfactory value of N.

I will split up this series by driver (8390, sonic, etc) so it's more 
clear which patches are independent and which patches can be reviewed 
together.

Thanks.

-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux